| 10th
Research Postgraduate Symposium
Saturday, December 3, 2005, Faculty of Medicine Building
Presentation Assessment Guidelines
- Each MPhil/PhD/MRes(Med) student will be given 8 minutes
for presentation and 2 minutes for discussion.
- Each Chairperson will independently give a score out
of 100 to each presenter on the marking sheet provided
using the following scheme as a guide:
Oral presentation |
30% |
Slides preparation |
20% |
Scientific content |
30% |
Timing |
10% |
Questions & Answers |
10% |
- Chairpersons will make reference to the following general
descriptions on the overall quality of the presentation
while determining the mark to be given:
80 and above
|
Outstanding |
Excellent in all aspects. |
70-79 |
Excellent |
- good to excellent in
oral and slides presentation, with only minor deficiencies
in other aspects. |
60-69 |
Good |
- good overall, with some
weakness in certain aspects, especially presentation
skills. |
50-59 |
Satisfactory |
- generally up to standard;
having been able to demonstrate basic understanding
in and knowledge of the subject matter, but with some
unclear points. |
Below 50 |
Barely satisfactory |
- ideas presented are not
clear; failure to demonstrate basic understanding in
the subject matter; poor presentation skills. |
- The best MPhil/MRes(Med) presenter in each session will
be awarded a Certificate of Merit and the best PhD presenter
in each session will be invited to deliver a second presentation
at the Plenary Session.The top PhD presenter will be awarded
the Best Presentation Award and the other PhD presenters
will also be awarded the Certificates of Merit.
|
