|
||
Dr. D.Y.C. Leung
|
Introduction
Various methods have been devised for the prediction of atmospheric pollution, which lead to over 100 types of model for different applications. The Gaussian air dispersion model, or its various segmented plume and puff advection progeny, is the most popular and widely adopted model in the world. These models, however, often fail to predict accurately under complex wind and turbulence patterns found in coastal zones and complex terrains such as those presence in Hong Kong and some other similar cities in the world. This study concerns about the development of a powerful air dispersion model for Hong Kong to replace traditional Gaussian models.
Objectives
Due to the inadequacy of the Gaussian models to predict the complex situation in Hong Kong, there is a genuine need to develop a more powerful and accurate air dispersion model for Hong Kong. Thus the main objectives of this project are:
| 1. | To develop a powerful and accurate air dispersion model to suit the complex topography of Hong Kong, and |
| 2. | To validate, calibrate and tune the model developed. |
Model features
The model consists of two separate modules:
| a) | Flow module
|
| b) | Dispersion module
|
Flow module
application: from large scale extra-tropical storms (50-100 km mesh) to smaller mesoscale events (2 km mesh or lower);
Simulation tests
| (a) | (b) |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 1 Simulated wind field & other parameters at the 1st level of inner domain. (a) wind field and vertical velocity; (b) wind field and temperature.

(A) from the Hong Kong radiosonde measurements by Hong Kong Observatory (B) simulated by the model at the cell (21,13) of the inner domain |
Table 1. Simulated and measured wind, temperature and humidity at selected isobaric surfaces at 8:00 pm (local time) on 11 Oct. 1994.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 2 Simulated and measured wind field (2 km resolution).
Dispersion module
Simulation tests

Fig. 3 Normalized pollutant concentration under convective atmospheric boundary layer.

Fig. 4 Normalized plume height for different emission heights under convective atmospheric boundary layer.

Fig. 5 Centreline pollutant concentrations for ground level emission under convective atmospheric boundary layer.

Fig. 6 Normalized pollutant concentration for flow over a cone.

Fig. 7 Normalized centreline pollutant concentration for flow over different terrain configurations.
Conclusions
| 1. | A sophisticated air dispersion model is developed, which consists of 2 modules for wind field and dispersion calculation. |
| 2. | The MC2 meteorological model has been selected and adapted to the H.K. conditions, which is proved capable of simulating high resolution 3-D fields of wind and other meteorological parameters, using reasonable computer time and memory resources. |
| 3. | A 3-D second order dispersion model is developed and validated extensively with experimental and field measurement results. |
Funding Source: RGC $641,000
Co-investigator: Prof. A.T.Y. Chwang
Research staff: Dr. M. Niewadomski, Dr. C.H. Liu, Mr. W.K. Tse