Home
About the Centre
People
Events
 
Publications
Research Projects & Issues
Research Resources
Human Rights Programme
Links
 
 

Events > Conferences & Lectures > Sentencing

      

Comparative National Experiences of Autonomy:

Purpose, Structures and Institutions

9 April 2005

PROGRAMME

Panel I: Purposes of Autonomy

Moderator: Yash Ghai

Lord David Steel First Presiding Officer  of the Scottish Parliament and member of the UK House of Lords

Stephen Lam, Secretary for Constitutional Affairs, Hong Kong SAR Government

Hon Bob Rae Former Premier of Ontario

 

Panel II: Institutions of autonomy

Moderator: Sonny Lo (TBC)

Dr. Oskar Peterlini Italy/South Tyrol

Christopher Himsworth Scotland/UK

Dr. Markku Suksi Finland/Aaland Island

 

Panel III: Autonomy in three Asian giants

Moderator: Ling Bing

China: Dr. Ao Junde

India: Dr. Rekha Chowdhary

Indonesia: Dr. Ryaas Rasyid

 

Closing remarks & commentary on the day’s discussion

Albert Chen

Joseph Cheng

 

Participants at the conference explored structures and institutions of various autonomous regions, with the aim of providing guidance on which methods are most effective in achieving the objectives of autonomy. The conference concentrated on thematic issues, the choice of which was influenced by the arrangements for and experience of Hong Kong's autonomy. Hong Kong's system has recently come under considerable stress as Hong Kong people seek a greater measure of democracy and accountability that cannot be accommodated under the current arrangements. The comparative perspectives at this conference were intended to point to institutional solutions to some of the challenges now facing the Hong Kong SAR.

   Markku Suksi and Christopher Himsworth

Mr Stephen Lam, Hong Kong's Secretary for Constitutional Affairs, opened the session with an outline of Hong Kong 's autonomy. He was joined on the first panel by Lord David Steel, who spoke about autonomy in the context of Europe 's changing political architecture; and Hon. Robert Rae, who explored federalism in the Canadian context and beyond as a solution to the kinds of problems often addressed by autonomy systems. Two other panels covered institutions of autonomy and autonomy in some major Asian countries. There was a summary at the end of the day by two Hong Kong academics. The day was well attended by scholars, students, legal practitioners, and government officials.

      

More photos